🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, coercive communications persisted. Originally, reportedly from a former police officer and a retired army general, later from the authorities. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh states he was summoned to the local precinct and warned explicitly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

The leather artisan is part of a group resisting a expensive redevelopment plan where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces demolished and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of this area is unparalleled in the globe," explains Shaikh. "However the plan aims to destroy our way of life and silence our voices."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that loom over the area. Residences are assembled randomly and often lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the environment is filled with the suffocating smell of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the promise of a renewed Dharavi into a developed area of luxury high-rises, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and homes with two toilets is an aspirational dream come true.

"We don't have proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for youth to recreate," explains a tea vendor, 56, who moved from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

However, some, including Shaikh, are fighting against the redevelopment.

Everyone acknowledges that the slum, historically ignored as unauthorized settlement, is urgently needing economic input and modernization. However they worry that this initiative – lacking community input – could potentially convert valuable urban land into a luxury development, evicting the marginalized, immigrant populations who have been there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these excluded, relocated individuals who established the uninhabited area into an extensively researched phenomenon of self-reliance and business activity, whose economic value is worth between one million dollars and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.

Displacement Concerns

Of the roughly a million people living in the dense 2.2 square kilometer area, fewer than half will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is estimated to take a significant period to finish. Additional residents will be transferred to wastelands and coastal regions on the far outskirts of the metropolis, risking break up a long-established community. Certain individuals will not get homes at all.

Those allowed to continue living in the neighborhood will be allocated units in tower blocks, a substantial change from the organic, collective approach of living and working that has sustained Dharavi for many years.

Businesses from clothing production to clay work and waste processing are projected to decrease in quantity and be moved to an allocated "business area" distant from homes.

Existential Threat

For residents like this protester, a craftsman and third generation resident to reside in the slum, the project presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-storey facility creates apparel – sharp blazers, suede trenches, decorated jackets – sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and overseas.

Relatives lives in the accommodations underneath and laborers and sewers – laborers from other states – live there, allowing him to sustain operations. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are often significantly costlier for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

Within the government offices close by, a conceptual model of the Dharavi project depicts a very different perspective. Slickly dressed residents mill about on bicycles and eco-friendly transport, purchasing western-style baguettes and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area outside a restaurant and Ice-Cream. This depicts a complete departure from the 20-rupee idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that maintains local residents.

"This represents no progress for residents," states the protester. "It's a massive property transaction that will render it impossible for our community to continue."

There is also distrust of the development company. Run by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and a close ally of the national leader – the corporation has encountered allegations of favoritism and ethical concerns, which it rejects.

Although administrative bodies labels it a partnership, the developer contributed a significant amount for its controlling interest. A lawsuit stating that the initiative was questionably assigned to the business group is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Continued Intimidation

From when they initiated to actively protest the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents state they have been faced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – comprising messages, direct threats and insinuations that speaking against the development was tantamount to opposing national interests – by people they assert represent the corporate group.

Part of the group suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c